Commonwealth v. Mock
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
This is the Commonwealth’s interlocutory appeal from a Superior Court judge’s order allowing the defendant’s motion to suppress. See Mass.R.Crim.P. 15(a)(2), as appearing in 422 Mass. 1501 (1996). The Commonwealth claims that the judge erred when he ruled that the actions of the police constituted a seizure for which they lacked reasonable suspicion.
Factual background. The judge found the following facts. See Commonwealth v. Bottari, 395 Mass. 777, 780 (1985). At 9:55 p.m. on February 17, 1998, two Springfield police officers, Frederick Peck and John Zoilo, responded to 57/59 Federal Street,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Commonwealth v. SilvaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Commonwealth v. GrandisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- United States v. Carl BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Commonwealth v. YesilcimanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Buster v. George W. Moore, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. DooceyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Commonwealth v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Commonwealth v. GomesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.