Legal Opinion
State v. Grey
Montana Supreme Court
Decided December 5, 1995No. 95-043PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson
Defendant Frank Michael Grey (Grey) appeals from the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County’s order denying his motion to suppress his videotaped statement and judgment of conviction. We reverse.
We find the following issue dispositive:
Whether the District Court erred in denying Grey’s motion to suppress his videotaped statement on the ground that the statement was obtained involuntarily and thus in violation of Grey’s Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination?
BACKGROUND
John Zauner (Zauner) owns a Western Auto store in Kalispell, Montana where Grey was employed as a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Spano v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Brown v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. LohMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. SiegalMontana Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. WeaverMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. LockhartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. WorrallMontana Supreme Court · 1999
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.