Legal Opinion

ROY AND ANNE v. Valparaiso Community Schools

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided January 30, 1997No. 2:95-cv-00295PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LOZANO, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the following: (1) Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Plaintiffs on March 21, 1996; and (2) School Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on April 26, 1996. For the reasons set forth below, the Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, and School Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT IN PART.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs, Roy and Anne A. (“the Parents”), are the parents of Matt A., a child with disabilities and special education needs. Defendants are a variety of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Roland M. And Miriam M. v. The Concord School CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. John Doe, a Minor, by and Through His Parent and Next Friend, Mary Doe v. ICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. Board Of Education Of Murphysboro Community Unit School District No. 186 v. Illinois State Board Of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. A.S. v. Madison Metropolitan School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2007
  2. School District of Wisc9onsin Dells v. Z.S.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2001
  3. Keith H. v. Janesville School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API