McManus v. Bendlage
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
VALLEE, J. pro tem.
Suit upon a judgment. In April, 1937, Bendlage, appellant-defendant, made a written contract with Kohlsaat and Krieger. Bendlage, in the contract, represented that he was the sole owner of secret formulae and processes of manufacture of medicinal products known as “Vesodyne.” He agreed to sell and deliver to Kohlsaat and Krieger the secret formulae and processes, patent rights, trademarks, copyrights and trade names, all assets, books and records of his business which had been carried on under the name “Anthony Lily Co.,” and its goodwill, together with all interest in and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Panos v. Great Western Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Sutphin v. SpeikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Todhunter v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stafford v. YergeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Abbott v. Western National Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
- Fairchild v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Legg v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Richardson v. ParmenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.