Richardson v. Parmenter
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.
The crucial question on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in finding that petitioner Parmenter was the surviving spouse of the decedent Norris L. Coleman. Procedurally, the question arose by the filing of petitions for letters of administration by both parties to these proceedings. The Richardson petition is based on the fact that petitioner (who is a former wife of decedent) is the guardian of the persons and estates of their two minor sons. The Parmenter petition is on the theory that she is the widow;. since, however, remarried to her former husband. The court granted the latter…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Dillard v. McKnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Rediker v. RedikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Estate of DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Dietrich v. DietrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Brown v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Getty v. GettyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Leatherbury v. LeatherburyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Estate of ShankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.