Al-Rowaishan Establishment Universal Trading & Agencies, Ltd. v. Beatrice Foods Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
Defendant Beatrice Foods Co. (“Beatrice”) moves to compel production of certain documents prepared by Roger Boyle, Esq., (“Boyle”) the attorney for plaintiff-intervenor Seena Corporation Limited (“Seena”). The documents consist of a digest of a deposition of John Kelly, (“Kelly”) a shareholder of Seena, with marginal notes *780added to the digest by Boyle, all of which Kelly read in preparing for a later deposition. With the consent of the parties, the documents in question were viewed by the Court in camera.
Beatrice cites a number of eases which hold that the work-product…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bailey v. Meister Brau, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
- Marshall v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1980
3Cited by13 opinions
- Magee v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Intermedics, Inc. v. Ventritex, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1991
- Ehrlich v. HoweDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Boring v. KellerDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1983
- Baker v. CNA InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.