Legal Opinion

Marshall v. United States Postal Service

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 4, 1980No. Civ. A. No. 78-602PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

AUBREY E. ROBINSON, Jr., District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Quash Subpoena in the above captioned action. The facts may be succinctly stated as follows:

In 1978 Plaintiff-intervenors and Defendant settled certain private class actions brought pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. That Act provides, inter alia, that no employee may be a party unless he or she so consents in writing. 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). Thus, employees who did not so consent (hereinafter referred to as “non-plaintiffs”) could not directly benefit from the 1978…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burlington Industries v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
  2. Bailey v. Meister Brau, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
  3. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Underwriters Laboratories, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Dresser Industries, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1978

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Chubb Integrated Systems Ltd. v. National BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
  2. James Julian, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982
  3. Intermedics, Inc. v. Ventritex, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1991
  4. Baker v. CNA InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API