Legal Opinion

Radcliff Finance Corp. v. City Motor Sales, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1959No. A-7038PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker

This is a controversy over the title to a 1953 Cadillac automobile purchased by J. Caruthers, hereinafter referred to as respondent, from City Motor Sales, Inc. The latter will be referred to in this opinion as City Sales. Radcliff Finance Corporation, petitioner, brought the suit against City Sales and respondent to recover on a note executed to it by City Sales and foreclose a chattel mortgage on the automobile. After a trial before the court without a jury, judgment was entered in favor of petitioner and against City Sales for the amount owing on the. note, but respondent was awarded title…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Motor Investment Co. v. City of Knox CityTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Guinn v. LokeyTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Texas Automotive Dealers Ass'n v. Harris County Tax Assessor-CollectorTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Brinkman v. RickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Radcliff Finance Corp. v. City Motor Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1958

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Drake Insurance Co. v. Tommy Paul KingTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Lundy v. First National Bank (In Re Dota)District Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
  3. Doyle v. HarbenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Credit Industrial Corp. v. Pacific Finance Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  5. Jones v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API