Legal Opinion
Carthan-Ragland v. Standard Bank & Trust Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 14, 2012No. 11 C 5864PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
GARY FEINERMAN, District Judge.
Maxine Carthan-Ragland and Warren G. Ragland commenced this lawsuit by filing a pro se complaint against Standard Bank & Trust Co., GMAC Mortgage, LLC, and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”), seeking damages for alleged violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq., and the common law of fraud. Doc. 1. The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), and gave Plaintiffs a chance to replead. 2012 WL 1658244…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Geinosky v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- KRUPSKI v. COSTA CROCIERE S. P. ASupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Bonte v. U.S. Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Beach v. Ocwen Federal BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Financial Freedom Acquisition, LLC v. Standard Bank and Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Financial Freedom Acquisition, LLC v. Standard Bank and Trust CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Harbour v. Parker Hannifin Corporation Medical Systems DivisionDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024