Legal Opinion

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Britrail Travel International Corp.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 20, 1990No. Civ. A. No. 89-2372PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LECHNER, District Judge.

This is an age discrimination suit commenced 22 May 1989 by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq., as amended (the “ADEA”). The complaint alleges the termination of certain employees on 27 March 1987 by defendant Britrail Travel International Corporation (“Britrail”) violated the ADEA. Jurisdiction is based upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343, 1345. Presently before the court is Britrail’s motion for summary judgment.1

Facts

The events leading to this action began in February…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Lusardi v. LechnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McConnell v. Thomson Newspapers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1992
  2. Harter v. GAF Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Britrail Travel International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API