Heffernen v. City of Green Bay
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.
This action arose out of the execution of a written contract dated August 25, 1953, between the respondent, city of Green Bay, and the respondent, Chester McDonald, for the dismantling of an old bridge and the construction of a new one over the East river at North Webster avenue in Green Bay. Appellant contends that the contract is invalid for the reason that Alderman Otto Rachals was an employee of the respondent, Chester McDonald, at the time of the letting of the bids and the execution of the contract for the bridge project. It is the position of the respondents that Rachals was not such…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stockton Plumbing & Supply Co. v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Cason v. City of LebanonIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Edward E. Gillen Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Lewick v. GlazierMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by7 opinions
- Singewald v. Minneapolis Gas CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- (1971), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1971
- City of Kingsport v. LayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1970
- (1971), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1971
- Opinion No. Oag 33-88, (1988), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.