Legal Opinion
Singewald v. Minneapolis Gas Company
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 13, 1966No. 39953PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
Appeal from a judgment of the district court.
On August 17, 1964, the Burnsville village council adopted Ordinance No. 33 as a result of which the Minneapolis Gas Company was granted a nonexclusive franchise for the sale and distribution of gas in a part of that village. As a result, both the Minneapolis Gas Company and a competing utility, the Minnesota Valley Natural Gas Company, have franchise rights in the area involved.
Action was instituted to have the ordinance declared void upon the ground that one of the members of the council was interested in the franchise contract authorized by the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Stockton Plumbing & Supply Co. v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Josephson v. Planning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- First National Bank v. Village of GoodhueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Stone v. BevansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Hobbs, Wall & Co. v. MoranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wilson v. Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- Waikiki Resort Hotel, Inc. v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- Griswold v. City of HomerAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Hanig v. City of WinnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Sugarloaf Citizens Ass'n, Inc. v. GudisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.