Legal Opinion

Dynacon, Inc. v. D & S CONTRACTING, INC.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1995No. 15,702PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTZ, Judge.

D & S Contracting, Inc., (Contractor) appeals a summary judgment holding that it could not substitute roofing subcontractors on a public works contract. This appeal presents our first opportunity to interpret New Mexico’s Subcontractors Fair Practices Act (the Act), NMSA 1978, §§ 13-4-31 to -43 (Repl.Pamp.1992). By requiring prime contractors who bid on a public works project to disclose the subcontractors they will use on the project, the Act restricts the practices known as bid shopping and bid peddling. “Bid shopping is the use of the low bid already received by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southern California Acoustics Co. v. C. V. Holder, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Meadowbrook Carting Co. v. Borough of Island HeightsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  3. Brown & Son Electric Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. Mutz v. Municipal Boundary CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Prismatic Dev. v. Somerset CountyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ray Bell Construction Co. v. School DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Romero Excavation & Trucking, Inc. v. Bradley Construction Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Konover Development Corp. v. Waterbury Omega, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
  4. Process Equip. & Serv. Co. v. N.M. Tax'n & RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. Ray Bell Construction Co. v. School DistrictCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API