Legal Opinion
Prismatic Dev. v. Somerset County
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 27, 1989PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
236 N.J. Super. 158 (1989)
564 A.2d 1208
PRISMATIC DEVELOPMENT CORP., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
SOMERSET COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS AND TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 19, 1989.
Decided September 27, 1989.
Before Judges BILDER, ASHBEY and ARNOLD M. STEIN.
Harry L. Garman argued the cause for appellant (Garman & Amdur, attorneys; Harry L. Garman and Sanford Amdur, on the brief).
William E. Ozzard argued the cause for respondent Somerset County Board of Chosen Freeholders (Ozzard, Wharton, Rizzolo, Klein,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Service Armament Co. v. HylandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- Broadway Maintenance Corp. v. RutgersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- State v. SciosciaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Stano v. Soldo Constr. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Cardell, Inc. v. Tp. of WoodbridgeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Meadowbrook Carting Co. v. Borough of Island HeightsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Ray Bell Construction Co. v. School DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Gaglioti Contracting, Inc. v. City of HobokenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Williams Bros. Construction, Inc. v. Public Building CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Dynacon, Inc. v. D & S CONTRACTING, INC.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.