Legal Opinion

United States v. Bayard Spector

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 3, 1989No. 89-1948PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Bayard Spector appeals from the final order of the district court 1 denying as untimely his motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33, 2 and denying his request to convert his motion to a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We affirm.

Spector was convicted of drug-related crimes by a jury on September 25, 1984. A government informant and three of Spec-tor’s four codefendants testified against him at the trial. A divided panel of this court affirmed his conviction and sentence. United States v. Spector, 793 F.2d 932 (8th…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Ray J. Beran and Andrew Kaminski, A/K/A Andrew M. KaminskiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  2. James Dean Walker v. A.L. Lockhart, Superintendent of the Arkansas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Bayard SpectorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Mark Edwin CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. James CodyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Michael J. Guinan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Domingo ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Alejandro Cruz-Padilla, Also Known as Roberto Barriga TinocoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Mary Magdalene Johnson Carolyn Faye WaltersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  5. State v. LuceroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API