Legal Opinion

United States v. Alejandro Cruz-Padilla, Also Known as Roberto Barriga Tinoco

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 8, 2000No. 99-3794PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.

A jury convicted Alejandro Cruz-Padilla of three counts of possession with intent to distribute and conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(l)(A)(viii), and 846. Following the verdict, the district court 2 entered an order granting a new trial on the basis of improper prosecutorial statements made during closing arguments. The government appeals, arguing that the district court lacked jurisdiction to grant a new trial, because Cruz-Padilla’s motion was untimely filed pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. 33. Alternatively, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. McCleskey v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. Keith M. FreisingerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. Roquel Allen CarterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  2. Greene v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. United States v. Alejandro J. VillalpandoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Rosario Placensia, Also Known as Cheyenne, Also Known as JaimeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Gary Flute, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API