Dye v. Forbes
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Wa-seca county, Buc.kham, J., presiding, overruling a demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtDicKinson, J.
Appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint. The asserted claim of the plaintiffs arises from the performance of a contract made in September, 1883, in writing and under seal, in which one Davis and the defendant Forbes are named as the contracting parties, and which was executed by them. We shall hereafter consider more particularly the effect of some of the provisions of this contract. For the present it is enough to say that by it Davis became obligated to construct a dwelling-house for the defendant Forbes upon her land, and to provide the material therefor, for the entire…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barron v. MullinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Keller v. HoulihanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Clark v. SchatzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- Anderson v. KnudsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mannheimer v. PhinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- McGlauflin v. BeedenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Lovering v. Webb Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Red River Lumber Co. v. Children of IsrælNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897