McGlauflin v. Beeden
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant Beeden from a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county, where the action was tried by Lochren, J.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
January 14, 1887, the defendant Emma Beeden, as the owner of certain real property, entered into a contract with the ■defendants Schunstrom and Ephraim Johnson, whereby she agreed to sell and convey the same to them. But a small sum was paid at the date of the contract, the balance of the purchase price falling due ■June 1st following. As a part of this contract it was agreed that the purchasers should erect three dwelling-houses upon the premises, each ■of specified dimensions, by said 1st day of June, which dwellings were to be the absolute property of said vendor, as additional security…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Meyer v. BerlandiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Hill v. GillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Keller v. HoulihanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Clark v. SchatzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- Rugg v. HooverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harper Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. C. O. TeateSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Harris v. HarrisColorado Court of Appeals · 1897
- Harris v. HarrisColorado Court of Appeals · 1897
- Red River Lumber Co. v. Children of IsrælNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897