Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Gladden

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1967PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

Petitioner sought post-conviction relief. The defendant warden filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that the petitioner had a direct appeal from his conviction in which he was represented by counsel and could reasonably have asserted the grounds now urged for post-conviction relief, and upon the ground, in effect, that the petition did not allege facts upon which relief could be granted. The motion was granted.

Petitioner was convicted of burglary. Through his court-appointed attorney he appealed to this court, and his conviction was affirmed. State v. Haynes, 233 Or 292, 377 P2d 166…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. State v. VawterOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Calhoon v. HarveySupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Anderson v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. State v. HaynesOregon Supreme Court · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lay v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
  2. State v. WalleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
  3. Haynes v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Howell v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. KnightenOregon Supreme Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API