Legal Opinion

Howell v. Gladden

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1967PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

A prisoner appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition for postconviction relief. The facts concerning his burglary conviction are set forth in State v. Howell, 237 Or 382, 388 P2d 282 (1964).

The issue tried in the postconviction proceedings below was whether the defendant had been convicted in part by the use of illegally seized evidence. The officer, while arresting the prisoner for drunk driving, seized a roll of coins and burglars’ tools from the automobile. These exhibits (and others) were used by the state in convicting the prisoner. The postconviction court held, on the merits,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. State v. AventOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. State v. AbelOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Benson v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Delaney v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. John Harold Howell v. Hoyt C. Cupp, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. State v. KnightenOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Jensen v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Gilbert v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API