Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hammond v. County of Hennepin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 20, 1959No. 37,720PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Appeal from an order of the trial court denying appellant’s petition for a writ of coram nobis.

In September 1956 appellant, represented by a counsel of his own choosing, was found guilty of burglary in the first degree after a jury trial in the district court.

Instead of obtaining a settled case, which is required by our rules, 1 appellant has made available to this court a partial transcript and a synopsis of the evidence upon which he was convicted. 2 Despite such irregularity, and in view of the fact that a writ of coram nobis (assuming it is available in a criminal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. State v. SoltauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. State v. KubusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. State Ex Rel. Barness v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. State Ex Rel. Soward v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. CastleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. State Ex Rel. Gaulke v. County of WinonaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. State v. TellockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. State v. PedersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API