Legal Opinion

United States v. McDowell

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided April 5, 1990No. ACM 28033PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

KASTL, Senior Judge:

Mil.R.Evid. 404(b) — evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts — is the Russian nesting doll of military law. Twist one of these “matrioshka” dolls at the waist and out tumble a confusing succession of smaller and smaller dolls. In this simile, they are called by such names as plan, motive, design, intent, scheme, and the like. In one of their more recent appearances, the term bad attitude has been suggested; see United States v. Ferguson, 29 M.J. 559 (A.F.C.M.R.1989). Finally, in an effort to bring rationality to a most complex area, the Court of Military Appeals…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. ReynoldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  2. United States v. Luis Albert GillespieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. CastilloUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  4. United States v. GambleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  5. United States v. FergusonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  2. United States v. HebertU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API