Legal Opinion

Kohlhauer v. Bronstein

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 11, 1937No. Civ. 11399PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrail, P. J.

—This case comes before us on a motion to dismiss or to affirm the judgment. The appeal is by the defendant from a judgment in an automobile collision ease. The plaintiff was traveling along the highway parallel to a street ear and at the same rate of speed, but near the curb of the street. Just as the street car was crossing an intersection the defendant “shot” his automobile across and in front of the street car and into a collision with the plaintiff's motorcycle.

The court gave an instruction to the jury on the doctrine of sudden peril, and the first contention of the defendant is that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Raymond v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. In Re the Estate of De LaveagaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Wiley v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Baldarachi v. LeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fischer v. KeenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Nungaray v. Pleasant Valley Lima Bean Growers & Warehouse Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Hall v. Boise Payette Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Edgett v. FairchildCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Keller v. Key System Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API