Legal Opinion

Stacy M. v. Jason M.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 2015No. S-14-214PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets STACY M. v. JASON M. 141 Cite as

290 Neb. 141

the future, after he was no longer legally detained on the California sentence, it would be illegal to detain him on the Nebraska sentences. Such a “possibility of future illegal detention” is not the basis for a writ of habeas corpus. See

id.

Because a writ of habeas corpus was not available to Johnson based on the claims he made in his petition and his position at the hearing, we agree with the district court that he was not entitled to habeas corpus relief. CONCLUSION We conclude that the district court did not err when it…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. DeVaux v. DeVauxNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. ThorpeNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Younkin v. YounkinNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Caniglia v. CanigliaNebraska Supreme Court · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fetherkile v. FetherkileNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Hill v. AMMC, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Poullos v. Pine Crest HomesNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Erin W. v. Charissa W.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Hill v. AMMC, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API