Legal Opinion

Caniglia v. Caniglia

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 2013No. S-12-794PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets 930 285 NEBRASKA REPORTS in § 21-2014(21). For evidence to be relevant to the standing issue in this case, the evidence must show whether shares of WBI were registered in Bruce’s name or whether Bruce was a beneficial owner of shares to the extent of rights granted by a nominee certificate on file with WBI. The exhibits at issue do not contain information regarding these facts. Thus, we deter- mine that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it did not receive these exhibits into evidence. CONCLUSION The district court did not err when it determined that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kaplan v. BugallaTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Gangwish v. GangwishNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Mathews v. MathewsNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Incontro v. JacobsNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Wulff v. WulffNebraska Supreme Court · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Garza v. GarzaNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Steffy v. SteffyNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Carlson v. CarlsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Jeremiah J. v. Dakota D.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Hopkins v. HopkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API