Legal Opinion
In re Condemnation by the Redevelopment Authority of Lancaster of Real Estate
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 30, 1996PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NARICK, Senior Judge.
William H. McMichael, III (Condemnee) appeals from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County that overruled his amended preliminary objections to the declaration of taking filed by the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Lancaster (Authority) of property owned by Con-demnee. We affirm.
In 1978, Condemnee purchased an 18th century log home at 22 Reedy Lane in Lancaster (property). At that time, the property was occupied by tenants but was not connected to the Lancaster City public water and sewer system. Condemnee requested the City connect his property…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Condemnation by the Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Olson v. Whitpain TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- In Re Condemnation of Lands Situate & Being in the ScrantonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Marino v. Zoning Hearing Board of Harrison TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Condemnation of Premises 130 Court StreetCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mazur v. Trinity Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. DonahueCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Mazur v. Trinity Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Mercurio v. Allegheny County Redevelopment AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- York City Redevelopment Authority v. Ohio Blenders, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.