Bordeaux, Inc. v. American Safety Insurance
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtAgid, J.
¶1
This case concerns the nature of “self-insured retention” (SIR) provisions in the commercial general liability policies American Safety Insurance Company issued to condominium developers Bordeaux, Inc., and Cameray, Inc. Because the SIRs were not “insurance” in any traditional sense, the trial court properly ruled that they were not primary insurance for purposes of subrogation and the developers were entitled to be made whole before American Safety could recover funds from third-party settlements. Also, because an insurer is not entitled to apportion defense costs between two policies…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Boeing Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Ainsworth v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Grange Insurance v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Intervest Construction of Jax, Inc. v. General Fidelity Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 2014
- Utley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- S&K Motors, Inc. v. Harco National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.