Legal Opinion

Grange Insurance v. Roberts

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 28, 2013No. 69356-5-IPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Lau, J.

An insurer’s duty to defend arises “if the insurance policy conceivably covers the allegations in the complaint, whereas the duty to indemnify exists only if the policy actually covers the insured’s liability.” Woo v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 161 Wn.2d 43, 53, 164 P.3d 454 (2007) (emphasis omitted). Grange Insurance Association issued an insurance policy to Jane and Wes Roberts.1 The policy imposes on Grange a duty to defend its insureds but excludes intentional conduct from the duty to defend. Rebecca Brandis sued Roberts, alleging various torts stem*744ming from Roberts’s intentional…

2Cases cited83 opinions

  1. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Grimsby v. SamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of LoweCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. Lori Shavlik v. Dawson PlaceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  3. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am. v. WolkDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2018
  4. Ann Chaudhry , V Tyson D. DayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
  5. Capitol Specialty Insurance v. Beach Eatery & Surf Bar, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2014

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API