Legal Opinion
State v. Stein
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 10, 1940No. 1 Div. 122PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The certiorari seeks to review the action of the trial court and that of the Court of Appeals holding that the brokerage firm in question was not subject to the privilege license tax under the revenue laws of the state and the rules that obtain.
The preliminary statement should be made that the Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the Circuit Court of Mobile for the defendant in an action brought by the state for the privilege license levied by Section 348, Schedule 29 of the Revenue Code of 1935. General Acts 1935, pp. 256, 441, 450.
The case was tried upon an agreed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Western Live Stock v. Bureau of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hinson v. LottSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Texas Electric Railway Co. v. EastusSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Graybar Electric Co. v. CurrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- State v. Southern Natural Gas CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Leibold v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Jones v. City of OpelikaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- State v. Coca Cola Bottling Works, Inc.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1940
- Dorsett v. OverstreetSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
- Brown v. LucasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.