Legal Opinion

State v. Coca Cola Bottling Works, Inc.

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 1940No. 6 Div. 650PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Judge.

The controlling question is whether a non-discriminatory privilege license laid upon “Each person engaged [in this State] in the business of selling at wholesale nonalcoholic, carbonated, or other soft drinks * * * ” 1935 Rev.Code, Sec. 348, Schedule 129, Gen.Acts of Ala. 1935, pp. 256, 441, 491, as applied to appellee (defendant), infringes the commerce clause of the Federal Constitution. This appeal challenges the correctness of the decision of the trial court in ruling in the affirmative with respect thereto.

The appellee, a non-resident corporation of Columbus, Mississippi,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Western Live Stock v. Bureau of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. McGoldrick v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Emert v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sanford Service Co. v. City of AndalusiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  2. Sanford v. City of ClantonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Sanford Service Co. v. City of AndalusiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API