Legal Opinion

Dorsett v. Overstreet

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 19, 1944PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, J.:

The appellant is a broker selling in several south' Florida counties the products of manufacturers he selects. He maintains- no stock, but exhibits samples to prospective customers who are thus enabled to determine the variety and quality of goods they wish to buy. Other than his samples his equipment consists only of office furniture. The concerns he patronizes have their principal places of business outside the State of Florida. When a customer approaches him relative to the purchase of goods he displays the samples and orders according to the customer’s selection, but in cases…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Leloup v. Port of MobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Sprout v. South BendSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. East Ohio Gas Co. v. Tax Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Osborne v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Sprout v. City of South BendSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. City of TampaSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
  2. Armstrong v. City of TampaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API