Legal Opinion

United States v. Doost

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 10, 2019No. Criminal No. 2017-0109Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Criminal No. 1:17-CR-00109-APM ) AZAM DOOST, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER I. INTRODUCTION After an eight-day trial, a jury returned a verdict of guilty against Defendant Azam (“Adam”) Doost on (1) three counts of major fraud against the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1031(a); (2) eight counts of wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343; (3) four counts of making a false…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Anderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. BrandonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Nicholas J. Mangieri, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API