Legal Opinion

Erdy v. Columbus Paraprofessional Institute

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1991No. 89AP-1486PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant-appellant, Technology Education Corporation (“TEC”), appeals from the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas awarding plaintiffs-appellees, Gail A. Erdy, Tamara D. Wolford, and Monica Jones, $5,225 each against TEC, as well as two other defendants, for breach of contract to perform educational services.

Plaintiffs each entered into contracts with Paraprofessional Institutes of Ohio (“PIO”), in the early part of 1987. PIO operated an educational institution offering post-secondary technical and vocational training. Just before plaintiffs’ classes started, PIO sold the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Raymond Leannais and Catherine Leannais v. Cincinnati, Incorporated and Cincinnati-Forte Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  2. Flaugher v. Cone Automatic Machine Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Bonee v. L & M Construction ChemicalsDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1981
  4. TRACEY BY TRACEY v. Winchester Repeating Arms Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Cattron, Inc. v. Overhead Crane & Hoist, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. John R. Mickowski v. Visi-Trak Worldwide, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. Davis v. Loopco Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. City of Toledo v. Beazer Materials and Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1995
  4. Mickowski v. Visi-TrakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API