Legal Opinion

City of Toledo v. Beazer Materials and Services, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided November 20, 1995No. 3:90-cv-07344PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEAZER AND INTERLAKE’S CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WILLIAM K. THOMAS, Senior District Judge.

Cross-motions for Summary Judgment of Beazer and Interlake are ready for disposition.

On January 3, 1995 cross-defendant Beazer East, Inc., formerly known as Beazer Material Services, Inc. and, before that, Kop-pers Company, Inc. (“Beazer”) moved for Partial Summary Judgment against Cross-Plaintiffs, The Interlake Corporation, The In-terlake Companies, Inc., and Acme Steel Company (collectively “Interlake”) as to In-terlake’s Count III (Breach of Contract) and IV (Declaratory…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Welco Industries, Inc. v. Applied CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Nurad, Inc. v. William E. Hooper & Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  3. Worth v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Flaugher v. Cone Automatic Machine Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. City Management Corp. v. U.S. Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brush Wellman, Inc. v. MontesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
  2. Groupo Condumex v. Spx Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001
  3. Jongeward v. BNSF Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Jongeward v. BNSF Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API