Fala Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Resolving Motion to Amend the Complaint
MARGOLIS, Senior Judge.
This takings action is before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion to amend the complaint filed October 16, 2001. After carefully considering the parties’ written submissions and after oral argument, the Court denies plaintiffs’ motion.
FACTS
On April 14, 1998, plaintiffs brought suit claiming that they own, or owned, four parcels of beachfront property (“the property”), which lies between certain platted lots on the west and the Atlantic Ocean on the east, and on which the United States government (“defendant”) erected a seawall…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Skip Kirchdorfer, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Applegate v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Avenal v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- Greenco Corp. v. City of Virginia BeachSupreme Court of Virginia · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hanover Insurance Company (The) v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Joint Venture of Comint Systems Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011