People v. Bishop
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MASTERSON, J.
The discretionary decision whether to dismiss a “strike” in furtherance of justice requires consideration of the legitimate interests of society and of the defendant. Appellate review of that decision is limited. In this opinion, we reject the People’s argument that the trial court abused this discretion by failing to give the proper weight to “aggravating factors” as balanced against factors favoring leniency. Accordingly, we affirm an order dismissing strikes in furtherance of justice.
Background
Leland Clark Bishop was charged by information with petty theft with a prior…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. DentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. HumphreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- People v. ZichwicCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- People v. S.M.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- People v. BanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- People v. ThorntonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.