Legal Opinion

People v. S.M.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 1, 2017No. A147596PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUVOLO, P. J.

I

INTRODUCTION

The People appeal from the trial court’s dismissal of three felony and three misdemeanor criminal charges “in the furtherance of justice,” pursuant to Penal Code 1 section 1385, all relating to acts by respondent S.M. 2 allegedly arising out of the submission of a single false insurance claim to his automobile insurer in the amount of $360. After the case was pending for four years, the court dismissed it on December 17, 2015. We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the case.

II

THE TRIAL COURT DID NOT ABUSE ITS DISCRETION IN…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. BoyetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. OrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. MarroquinCalifornia Superior Court · 2017
  2. Khankin v. JLR San Jose, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
  3. People v. Hernandez CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. People v. Herrera CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. People v. Toluca Lake CollectiveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API