Legal Opinion

People v. Dent

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 11, 1995No. B089333PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MASTERSON, J.

Defendant Daniel Dent entered pleas of no contest to two “wobbler” offenses which the trial court found to be misdemeanors under Penal Code section 17, subdivision (b)(1). The People appeal from the ensuing judgment, contending that the “three strikes law” 2 abrogated the trial court’s discretion to declare wobbler offenses to be misdemeanors, and alternatively that the trial court abused its discretion in imposing a misdemeanor sentence on defendant. We follow the lead of three recent Court of Appeal decisions in holding that the three strikes law did not affect the trial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. WarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. People v. TrauschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. People v. Superior Court (Perez)California Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. People v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. StatumCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. ZichwicCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API