Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Erickson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 14, 1935No. 30,401PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In 1923 plaintiff obtained a decree of divorce with $1,000 as temporary and permanent alimony, suit money, and attorney’s fees. In 1930, upon plaintiff’s application, the decree was modified so as to provide for the payment thereafter ,of $150 per month alimony. Defendant appealed. There was an affirmance. Erickson v. Erickson, 181 Minn. 421, 232 N. W. 793. The situation at that time is fully covered by the decision. In 1932 defendant made an application for a modification of the decree as to the alimony. It was denied except that the monthly payments for the year 1933 were suspended. In 1934…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Craig v. CraigIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Lindbloom v. LindbloomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. Haskell v. HaskellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. Erickson v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Plankers v. PlankersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Triest v. TriestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API