Legal Opinion

Redmond v. United States

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 11, 2016No. Case Number 15-10466PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*610OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO PROHIBIT PLAINTIFFS PROPOSED EXPERT WITNESSES FROM TESTIFYING AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DAVID M. LAWSON, United States District Judge

Herbert Redmond’s estate sued the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act, alleging that medical personnel at the Detroit Veterans Administration Hospital committed medical malpractice in diagnosing and treating his liver cancer, which took his life. After discovery closed, the United States filed motions to exclude the plaintiffs proposed expert witnesses and for summary judgment. The Court heard oral…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Jesa Enterprises Ltd. v. Thermoflex Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
  2. Blackburn v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2024
  3. Boaz v. BufordDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
  4. Caudle v. Nielsen Holdings PLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  5. CellMark, Inc. v. Robert Webster, et al.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2026

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API