Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Booth

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 16, 1932No. Nos. 8876, 8938PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) We consider first the assignments of error in the cross-bill of exceptions. On the general grounds, we hold that the verdict is supported by the evidence; and on the grounds alleging that the court erred in its charge to the jury, we hold that there was no error requiring a new trial.

The effect of the verdict is that the title to the land in question is in the plaintiffs, Eliza Griffin and her son, Sidney Harmon, and in the son by Nellie Harmon, who is Jesse Harmon; that Nellie Harmon had no title to the land; and therefore that Nellie (Harmon) Odom was a…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Campbell v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  2. King v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  3. Hobby v. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  4. Flinn v. FlynnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  5. Patrick v. SimonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API