Legal Opinion
(PC) Binh Tran v. Fonseca
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 5, 2024No. 1:21-cv-00288Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BINH C. TRAN, Case No.: 1:21-cv-00288-CDB 12 Plaintiff, SECOND SCREENING ORDER 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS AND 14 V. FONSECA, et al., DEFENDANTS 15 Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 16 Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge 17 18 Plaintiff Binh C. Tran is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 19 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. 20 I. INTRODUCTION 21 The Court issued its First Screening Order on January 27, 2023. (Doc. 9.) The Court 22…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.