Legal Opinion
Arnott v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Services
District Court, C.D. California
Decided October 22, 2012No. SA 10-CV-1423(RNBx)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
DAVID 0. CARTER, District Judge.
Before the Court is a Motion for Class Certification (Dkt. 50) filed by Plaintiffs Heather Joy Arnott, et al. (Plaintiffs), in their suit against Defendants United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Janet Napolitano, Alejandro Mayorkas, and Rosemary Melville (Defendants). After considering the moving papers and oral arguments, this Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion and CERTIFIES the class.
I. Background
Plaintiffs are immigrant investors who sought lawful permanent residence in the United States…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hernandez v. County of MontereyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Waller v. Hewlett-Packard Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2013
- Ehret v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Moore v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Civil Rights Education & Enforcement Center v. Hospitality Properties TrustDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.