Legal Opinion

In Re Pstrak

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 12, 2004No. 25767PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent and Disciplinary Counsel have entered into an agreement pursuant to Rule 21, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, in which respondent admits misconduct and agrees to accept an admonition or a public reprimand. We accept the agreement and issue a public reprimand. 1 The facts, as set forth in the agreement, are as follows.

Facts

I. Real Estate Closing Matter I

Respondent attended a real estate closing in place of attorney J. Wendell Arsi, who had a conflict and could not attend. 2 The closing involved the purchase of a mobile home from a mobile home dealer and real property from a developer. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. Buyers Service Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Doe v. CondonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. In re McMillianSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  4. In re PstrakSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Slack v. JamesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  2. Doe Law Firm v. RichardsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Slack v. JamesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API