Legal Opinion

In re Pstrak

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 13, 2003No. 25580PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary matter, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel have entered into an Agreement for Discipline by Consent pursuant to Rule 21, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. In the agreement, respondent admits misconduct and consents to the imposition of a public reprimand or a definite suspension not to exceed eight months. We accept the agreement and find an eight month suspension from the *506practice of law is the appropriate sanction. The facts, as set forth in the agreement, are as follows.

Facts

In or around July 2000, respondent represented a client who had been charged with…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re PstrakSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API