Legal Opinion

State v. Koss

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1990No. 88-1908PublishedCited by 150 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

We shall first address whether the trial court erred in refusing to admit evidence of the battered woman syndrome. The trial court excluded the testimony based on the earlier decision of this court in State v. Thomas (1981), *21566 Ohio St. 2d 518, 20 O.O. 3d 424, 423 N.E. 2d 137.

In Thomas, swpra, the defendant alleged that she killed her common-law husband in self-defense. The trial court did not allow the defendant to introduce expert testimony on the battered woman syndrome in support of her defense. This court held that expert testimony on the battered woman syndrome was “inadmissible in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Bostic v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. DeemOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. RobbinsOhio Supreme Court · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by150 opinions

  1. State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. McKelton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. SallieOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1997

145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API