Legal Opinion
Fuller v. Montafi
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 23, 1921No. Civ. No. 3947PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
This appeal is from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in an action brought by her to enjoin the defendants Montafi, Giudici, and Donati from committing waste, consisting in the cutting by them of tan-oak timber upon certain lands and premises of which the plaintiff was the owner of an undivided interest as a tenant in common with one Kneeland L. Fuller, her son, who owned the other undivided interest therein. The said plaintiff did not join her said son as a party plaintiff in the action but the defendants undertook to make him a party thereto through the filing of a cross-complaint in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pardee v. Camden Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
- Pfeiffer v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Waterford I. Dist. v. Turlock I. Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Southern Investment Co. v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Nevels v. Kentucky Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Smith v. Cap Concrete, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Jay v. DollarhideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Graybiel v. BurkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Haws v. FracarolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Garibaldi v. GaribaldiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968