Legal Opinion

He v. Blinken

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 13, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2022-1137Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GENGSHU SCOTT HE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 22-cv-1137 (DLF) ANTONY BLINKEN, in his official capacity, and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Gengshu He and his family bring this action against Antony Blinken, in his official capacity, and the United States (together, the United States) for various wrongs He says he suffered as an employee of the State Department. The United States moves to dismiss He’s Second Amended Complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the following…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API