Legal Opinion
Whitney v. Whitney
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 30, 1959No. Civ. 18194PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
Plaintiff, Merry Katrinka Whitney, through her guardian ad litem, Merry Kathleen Whitney, appeals by a settled statement from the minute order denying her motion for temporary support pending trial.
Merry Kathleen Whitney, the mother of appellant, married respondent on November 26,1956, and separated on December 4, 1956. On February 11, 1957, the marriage was annulled. Thereafter, on September 27,1957, appellant was born weighing 6 pounds and 9 ounces. Mrs. Whitney had her last normal menstrual period in the latter part of December 1956 and experienced a shorter than normal period in the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McNamara v. McNamaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Chatham v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Estate of WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Carbone v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Dazey v. DazeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Setzer v. Department of Mental HygieneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Department of Mental Hygiene v. RosseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Guardianship of HicksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Department of Mental Hygiene v. PrestonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Fuss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.