City of New York v. Maul
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Graffeo, J.
We conclude that the Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion in affirming a Supreme Court order granting class action certification under CPLR article 9 to plaintiffs, a group of developmentally disabled children and young adults who are or *504have been in New York City’s foster care system. We therefore affirm the Appellate Division order.
I
This appeal concerns the alleged failures of the New York City Administration for Children’s Services (ACS) and the New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities (OMRDD) to fulfill their…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Nicholson v. ScoppettaNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Baby Neal v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Small v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Marisol A. ex rel. Forbes v. GiulianiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- Corsello v. Verizon New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2012
- Coleman v. DainesNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- Borden v. 400 East 55th Street Associates, L.P.New York Court of Appeals · 2014
- Matter of Elizabeth C. (Omar C.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People ex rel. McManus v. HornNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.